Spotify’s Social Influence– How Spotify Creates Conformity
Spotify actively participates in Social Identity Theory. Which is a theory argues that each of us has several ‘selves’ that relate to groups, hence we have an internal need to think of our-self as a collective and not an individual.
This can be shown in the facebook connect function. This allows us to see what our friends are listening to and they can view ours. These friends due to social influence we may influence us to listen to similar music they are listening to. An example of this in Article: Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgment by Whittaker JO. Which highlighted that it only takes a majority of 3 people for us to conform our behaviour to match theirs.
We may likewise pursue social standards in tuning in to what is ‘the standard, for example, Drake, and abstain from tuning in to tunes that conflict with social standards. This does not span to Spotify, numerous apps ask you to login through various social platforms
Consumer Attitudes of Spotify- How consumers view Spotify
Spotify’s Consumers have formed their attitude on Spotify through their direct personal experience with the company, which is considered a one of sources of influence on attitude formation (see image below), examined in the article Johnson N in the article Opinions and Personality.

This direct connection has led Consumers to be highly responsive towards Spotify.
This is shown especially in, Spotify’s customer service department, which is
highly regarded by its customers. For example, when Spotify’s app crashed.
Spotify remedied this situation through responding to customers’ concerns
promptly and across all channels and continued this type of customer engagement
long after the problem was fixed. Spotify went so far as to give every
complained customer a personalized message in playlist form (Image below).

Conditioning- Spotify’s Use of Instrumental Conditioning (Positive Reinforcement)
Spotify has also been known to engage instrumental conditioning in terms of both positive reinforcement and negative reinforcement.
Spotify has used positive reinforcement as recently as 2016, through it’s Rock star Rewards Program. In this program any Spotify member who applies in the Spotify Rock Star Program can earn points for finding new people and exposing those people to Spotify and new songs that they would enjoy. These points were published every 3 months and can be redeemed for prizes (below).

Spotify also engages in negative conditioning through it’s free version, of which the users played music will be stopped to play an add encouraging them to go to a paid subscription. This negative effect on the customer prompts customers to upgrade to a premium plan without ads preventing them from enjoying their service at any pay point.
Audio Ad Example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dk5sdECaJCY&ab_channel=Wolfborgg
The article by Chris Janiszewski, in the article “The Influence of Classical Conditioning Procedures”. Helps to state that positive reinforcement is more effective than negative reinforcement for brands due to the benefit of brand loyalty
Reference List
Whittaker JO, Meade RD. Social pressure in the modification and distortion of judgment: A cross-cultural study. International Journal of Psychology. 1967;2(2):109-113. doi:10.1080/00207596708247207. Accessed May 26, 2019
Johnson N. Opinions and Personality: Brown on the Law. Houston Law Review. 2010;(Issue 3):553. https://search-ebscohost-com.ezproxy.uow.edu.au/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edshol&AN=edshol.hein.journals.hulr47.24&site=eds-live. Accessed May 26, 2019.
Janiszewski C, Warlop L. The Influence of Classical Conditioning Procedures on Subsequent Attention to the Conditioned Brand. Journal of Consumer Research. 1993;20(2):171-189. https://search-ebscohost-com.ezproxy.uow.edu.au/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=9401112111&site=eds-live. Accessed May 26, 2019.









